Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:29

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How Cocaine Hijacks the Brain - Neuroscience News
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Science news this week: 'Dragon Man's' identity and the universe's 'missing matter' - Live Science
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Nick And Vanessa Lachey Selling Encino Home For Millions - TMZ
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sir Keir Starmer announces national inquiry into grooming gangs - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
⋆𐙚₊˚⊹♡ best K-pop Rappers In Your Own opinion?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Magnetic fields appear to be as old as the universe itself. What created them? - Space
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Black Ops 7 - Here Are 58 Screenshots For The Next Call Of Duty - GameSpot